Skip to content
Mesothelioma.net
phone iconCall1-800-692-8608 chat icon Chat 24/7 Live Chat
Menu
  • Malignant Mesothelioma
    • About Mesothelioma
      • How to Survive Mesothelioma
      • 100 Questions & Answers about Mesothelioma (Free Book)
      • Symptoms
      • Diagnosis
      • Prognosis
      • Life Expectancy
    • Types
      • Pleural
      • Peritoneal
      • Epithelioid
      • Sarcomatoid
      • Biphasic
    • Stages
      • Stage 1
      • Stage 2
      • Stage 3
      • Stage 4
    • Additional Information
      • Causes
      • Asbestos and Its Dangers
      • Facts
      • Support
      • Financial Compensation
      • FREE Mesothelioma Packet
  • Treatment
    • Treatment Options
      • Surgery
      • Chemotherapy
      • Radiation Therapy
      • Multimodal Therapy
      • Medications
      • Palliative Treatment
    • Find Top Doctors
      • Doctors
      • Treatment Centers
      • Treatment & Doctors Near You
      • New Treatments
      • Care Providers
      • Clinical Trials
      • Costs
  • Asbestos Trusts
  • Compensation
  • Veteran Assistance
    • Mesothelioma and Veterans
      • VA Claims for Mesothelioma
      • Vietnam Veterans
    • Military Branches and Asbestos
      • Navy Veterans
      • Navy Ships
      • Marine Corps Veterans
      • Army Veterans
      • Air Force Veterans
      • U.S. Coast Guard
  • Surviving Mesothelioma
  • About Us / Contact

Asbestos Company Attempts to Exclude Expert Testimony in Mesothelioma Lawsuit

Published on May 06, 2021

When a victim of asbestos exposure seeks justice for their mesothelioma or asbestos-related disease diagnosis, they file suit against the companies whose contaminated products they worked with. The strength of each case is dependent upon expert witnesses, who provide opinions as to how the victim’s mesothelioma developed, how much asbestos they would have been exposed to in their job, and more. Asbestos companies work hard to prevent these witnesses from being able to deliver their damaging opinions. In a recently heard case, a California judge ruled against a motion to have a physician’s testimony barred, allowing the noted physician to provide testimony on behalf of the mesothelioma victim. 

Mesothelioma Victim Filed Suit Against over Forty Companies

The mesothelioma victim in this case originally filed claims against forty different asbestos companies, blaming them for his exposure to asbestos via their contaminated products, and his family continued his case after his eventual death from the rare form of cancer. Included among the defendants was Honeywell International. Before his death from mesothelioma, Thomas Toy Sr. testified that he had installed the company’s Bendix brakes while working as a mechanic in the motor pool for the U.S. Army from 1954 to 1956 and as a civilian machinist at Treasure Island Naval Shipyard between 1974 and 1980. 

To support their assertion that the Bendix brakes had been responsible for his mesothelioma, Mr. Toy’s family enlisted Dr. Carl Brodkin, a specialist in occupational and environmental medicine with almost thirty years of experience. Upon review of Mr. Toy’s medical records and deposition testimony, as well as his employment records and other documents, Dr. Brodkin asserted that his work with and around Bendix brakes was a “substantial contributing factor” in his sickness and death. Honeywell challenged the doctor’s methodology and conclusions and filed a motion for his testimony to be blocked.

Court Denies Motion to Block Mesothelioma Expert’s Testimony

In reviewing Honeywell’s argument, District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. noted the rules of evidence that allow a qualified expert to testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise, and noted that those rules do not preclude the qualitative analysis of Mr. Toy’s exposure to asbestos being offered in lieu of hard evidence of quantities. They also pointed out that though asbestos companies often object to Dr. Brodkin’s testimony, those objections are generally overruled. When confronted with an assertion that Dr. Brodkin’s opinion runs counter to Honeywell’s reports that exposure to brakes does not cause mesothelioma, the judge indicated that a jury would have to decide whose argument was more compelling. The case and the expert’s testimony will move forward to be heard at trial.

If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you need access to expertise about asbestos and other factors contributing to your situation. For information about those resources, contact the Patient Advocates at Mesothelioma.net at 1-800-692-8608.

FREE Mesothelioma Packet

Written by Terri Oppenheimer

Terri Heimann Oppenheimer
Terri Heimann Oppenheimer is the head writer of our Mesothelioma.net news blog. She graduated from the College of William and Mary with a degree in English. Terri believes that knowledge is power and she is committed to sharing news about the impact of mesothelioma, the latest research and medical breakthroughs, and victims’ stories.

Learn more about and contact Terri
  • Malignant Mesothelioma
    • Treatment
    • Asbestos Trusts
  • Compensation
    • Veteran Assistance
    • Surviving Mesothelioma
  • FREE Mesothelioma Packet
    • Mesothelioma News
    • About Us / Contact
  • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Editorial Guidelines and Standards
This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.
The information provided by Mesothelioma.net is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Mesothelioma.net

5430 LBJ Freeway Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75240

Serving mesothelioma victims nationwide

1-800-692-8608

  • facebook
  • twitter
© 2022 Mesothelioma.net