HVAC Company’s Attempt to Be Dismissed from Mesothelioma Claim Fails in New York Court

It’s been more than four years since Michelle Togher and Peter Vincent filed a mesothelioma lawsuit against the many companies they blamed for their father’s illness. Charles Vincent had been exposed to multiple asbestos-contaminated products through the course of his life, and his family’s claim sought compensation from those responsible. Though one of the named defendants, SPX Cooling Technologies, filed a motion to have the case against them dismissed, a New York court denied their request, noting that they had misstated the law involved in their motion.

HVAC system

Defendant Fails to Meet Burden to Have Mesothelioma Case Dismissed

When a company seeks dismissal from a mesothelioma lawsuit, they have to be able to unequivocally prove that there is no conflict in evidence. This means that they must present evidence to support their argument and that failing to do so automatically defeats their motion for summary judgment. Further, because the law requires that all reasonable inferences should be placed in favor of the victim, their credibility should not be questioned before the case reaches a jury. 

In filing its motion for summary judgment of the mesothelioma claim, SPX Cooling not only failed to provide this required evidence but also misstated the law itself, offering a precedent that only applies to decisions that have already been made by a jury rather than the pre-trial situation that currently exists. They argued that the victim’s family had failed to prove causation when the only requirement pre-trial was that they show that there is a triable issue of fact.

Mesothelioma Victim Provided Sufficient Evidence of Triable Issue of Fact

By contrast, Mr. Vincent had provided what Justice Adam Silvera of the Supreme Court of New York referred to as “clear and unequivocal testimony regarding exposure history to [the defendant’s] products and proffers three expert reports regarding plaintiff-decedent’s quantification of asbestos exposure, causation analysis, and pathology and medical history respectively.”  

Based on the sufficiency of the mesothelioma victim’s testimony and the mistakes made by the defendant, the case will move on for a jury to decide.

If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma, the Patient Advocates at Mesothelioma.net can help. Contact us today at 1-800-692-8608 for more information.

Terri Heimann Oppenheimer

Terri Oppenheimer

Writer
Terri Heimann Oppenheimer is the head writer of our Mesothelioma.net news blog. She graduated from the College of William and Mary with a degree in English. Terri believes that knowledge is power and she is committed to sharing news about the impact of mesothelioma, the latest research and medical breakthroughs, and victims’ stories.

Learn More About And Contact Terri
Get Help Contacting Mesothelioma.net
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
24/7 Live Chat
Online Now