The tragedy of a mesothelioma diagnosis is not limited to the person diagnosed with the rare and fatal disease. The devastation that they face is shared by family members who are forced to watch their loved one battle a terminal illness and to face the reality of losing them. A loss of consortium claim included within an asbestos lawsuit recognizes the profound impact that mesothelioma has on spouses and others close to the victim. It seeks compensation for the harm the disease has done to cherished relationships and reflects the impact that asbestos-related diseases have on families and relationships forever.
What is Loss of Consortium?
Loss of consortium represents one of the most deeply personal aspects of seeking compensation through the legal system. While a personal injury lawsuit is principally focused on compensating the plaintiff for the harm that they have suffered, loss of consortium seeks recognition that the serious injury suffered by the victim has had life-changing effects throughout their entire family.[1]
Loss of consortium is a legal concept that acknowledges the intangible losses that family members experience when a loved one suffers harm due to another party’s wrongdoing. Unlike economic damages that can be calculated by adding up receipts, bills, and tax returns, consortium losses ask a judge and jury to quantify and provide the value of the human relationships that the illness or injury has caused: the companionship, intimacy, guidance, and emotional support that money can’t replace.[2]
The American legal system acknowledges that when someone is severely injured, their family members become victims too, losing important elements of their relationship that may never be restored. This loss is painfully obvious in mesothelioma cases, where families face the loss of normalcy, the reality that their time with their loved one is severely limited, and the knowledge that the pain they’re all feeling could have been prevented had asbestos companies acted ethically and responsibly.
Loss of Consortium in Mesothelioma Cases
Mesothelioma presents unique challenges for consortium claims because of the way that the disease progresses and the profound way that it affects families. Unlike sudden accidents that create immediate and obvious changes, asbestos-related diseases develop slowly over decades, remaining hidden until suddenly emerging with a painful terminal diagnosis. The long latency period, combined with the acuteness of the disease’s symptoms, creates complex legal questions about when consortium losses actually begin and how courts should measure damages that accumulate gradually, then intensify dramatically.
The progressive nature of mesothelioma means that consortium losses often occur in phases. Initial symptoms might subtly affect daily activities and intimacy while at the same time creating fear, uncertainty, anticipatory grief, and emotionally challenging role reversals as the healthy spouse becomes a caregiver. Treatment periods can involve physical separation, stress, and the misery of watching a loved one endure invasive or painful procedures. Most hurtful is the need for families to deal with a dramatically shortened life expectancy and the fact that their time together will be measured in months, weeks, and days rather than years.
Types of Consortium Claims in Asbestos Cases
Spousal Consortium
Spousal consortium claims represent the most common and recognized type of loss of consortium damage claims in mesothelioma lawsuits. These request compensation for multiple aspects of the marriage relationship losses, including:[1]
Companionship and Emotional Support: Mesothelioma fundamentally changes the dynamic between spouses. The healthy partner often becomes a full-time caregiver, shifting the relationship from an equal partnership (or even a situation where the victim had been the spouse more likely to take the lead) to a patient-caregiver dynamic. Spouses lose the person they confide in, their emotional anchor, and life partner as the disease steals increasing amounts of physical and emotional energy.
Physical Intimacy: The physical toll of mesothelioma, as well as of its treatments and their side effects, typically eliminates or severely reduces physical intimacy between spouses. Breathing difficulties, pain, fatigue, and the emotional burden of terminal illness create barriers to physical connection that couples often never overcome.
Household Services and Daily Life: As their disease progresses, mesothelioma patients become increasingly unable to perform routine household tasks, yard work, or family maintenance responsibilities. The healthy spouse must assume these duties while simultaneously providing medical care and emotional support, altering their daily routine as well as their relationship role.
Guidance and Protection: Spouses lose their partner’s input on important family decisions, financial planning, and life choices. The healthy spouse is often left to make critical family decisions on their own while simultaneously managing the responsibility of medical decision-making for their partner and their own exhaustion and grief.
Parental Consortium
In some states, children are allowed to claim consortium losses when a parent develops mesothelioma, though the availability and scope of these claims vary by where the mesothelioma lawsuit is being filed. When allowed, these claims recognize that children lose irreplaceable aspects of their relationship with their affected parent:[2]
Parental Guidance and Nurturing: Children lose access to their parent’s wisdom, advice, and emotional support during crucial periods in their lives. The parent’s focus necessarily shifts to battling their illness rather than actively parenting.
Companionship and Shared Activities: Family traditions, recreational activities, and quality time together disappear as the disease progresses. Children see their parent become increasingly unable to participate in sports, school events, family gatherings, or daily life.
Stability and Security: Knowing that a parent has a painful terminal illness creates trauma, profound anxiety, and insecurity in children. The family’s emotional foundation shifts from stability to crisis management.
Filial Consortium
A small number of jurisdictions allow parents to claim the loss of consortium when an adult child develops mesothelioma. These claims recognize the unique bond between parents and their children, regardless of age, and the devastating impact of watching a child face terminal illness.
Unique Aspects of Consortium Claims in Asbestos Litigation
Timing and Latency Complications
The decades-long latency period of asbestos diseases creates complex legal questions about when consortium losses actually begin. Courts must decide whether damages started accumulating:
- When the asbestos exposure occurred
- When the first symptoms appeared
- At the time of diagnosis
- When the disease began to significantly affect family relationships
The answer to these questions determines both how damages are calculated and resolves statute of limitations issues, as well as the overall legal strategy for presenting consortium claims.
Progressive Loss Pattern
Unlike accident cases, where consortium losses typically begin suddenly and remain relatively stable, mesothelioma creates intensifying losses of relationship elements over time. Early stages might involve subtle changes in energy levels and activities, but as the disease progresses, losses accelerate dramatically. This unique pattern means that courts need to consider both the level of losses during distinct phases of the illness and the duration of those impacts as the disease progresses.
Multiple Defendant Considerations
Mesothelioma lawsuits often name multiple asbestos companies as defendants, accusing them of responsibility for asbestos exposure based on either multiple products in specific time periods, different periods of asbestos exposure, or both. In addition to determining guilt, courts are asked to determine how to allocate consortium damages among various responsible parties. When it comes to consortium damages, some jurisdictions require that all defendants be held jointly liable for the full amount, while others attempt to apportion damages based on each defendant’s relative contribution to the exposure that caused the disease.
Integration with Wrongful Death Claims
Many mesothelioma lawsuits begin as personal injury claims but eventually shift to wrongful death cases as victims succumb to their disease. This creates complex questions about the relation between consortium claims and wrongful death damages. Some jurisdictions allow families to recover both pre-death consortium losses and post-death wrongful death damages, while others have rules meant to prevent double compensation for similar losses.
Evidence Required for Consortium Claims
Medical Documentation
Successful consortium claims require comprehensive medical evidence that illustrates how mesothelioma has specifically affected the patient’s capacity for normal family relationships. Medical experts must explain the disease’s impact on physical abilities, emotional state, energy levels, and life expectancy. This testimony helps juries understand the medical basis for relationship changes that families experience.
Relationship Documentation
Families must provide evidence of their relationship before the diagnosis and document how the disease changed their interactions. This might include:
- Testimony about shared activities and interests that are no longer possible
- Documentation of role changes within the family structure
- Evidence of increased caregiving responsibilities and their impact on relationship dynamics
- Photographs and videos showing family life before and after diagnosis
Lifestyle and Activity Evidence
Consortium claims benefit from detailed documentation of how the disease altered family life. This includes evidence of:
- Cancelled vacations and family plans
- Missed important family events and milestones
- Changes in social activities and community involvement
- Modifications to the home environment to accommodate illness
Caregiver Burden Documentation
The transformation of spouses into full-time caregivers represents a fundamental change in marital relationships. Evidence might include:
- Time logs showing hours devoted to medical care and assistance
- Medical appointments and treatment schedules that dominate family time
- Documentation of the physical and emotional demands of caregiving
- Impact on the caregiver’s own health and well-being
Damage Calculations in Mesothelioma Consortium Claims
Factors Affecting Award Amounts
Several factors influence the value of consortium claims in mesothelioma cases:
Duration of Impact: While mesothelioma’s relatively short survival time might suggest limited consortium losses, courts have recognized that the intensity of loss during this period can be extreme. In a notable case in Louisiana, the daughters of a mesothelioma victim were each awarded $2.75 million after the women provided wrenching testimony about the remarkable closeness between the man and his daughters, and the profound harm caused by the man’s painful death. Despite repeated appeals from defendant Union Carbide, the courts have continued to uphold the jury’s decision.
Age of Family Members: Younger couples typically receive higher consortium awards because they face loss of many years of companionship and shared experiences. However, older couples may receive substantial awards based on the intensity of their loss and the disruption of retirement plans and golden years together.
Quality of Relationship: Courts consider the strength and nature of family relationships before the illness. Couples with strong marriages and close family bonds typically receive higher awards than those with troubled relationships.
Severity of Symptoms: The specific symptoms and progression of each patient’s disease affect consortium awards. Patients who remain functional longer may generate lower awards than those who become severely incapacitated quickly.
Economic vs. Non-Economic Components
Consortium damages typically include both economic and non-economic elements:
Economic Components: Compensation for lost household services, childcare, home maintenance, and other tangible, quantifiable contributions the patient can no longer provide.
Non-Economic Components: Usually the more significant portion of a loss of consortium award, non-economic components cover emotional and relational losses, including companionship, affection, sexual relations, guidance, and emotional support.
Strategic Considerations when Pursuing Litigation
Settlement Negotiations
Consortium claims can significantly increase the settlement value of mesothelioma cases. Defense attorneys know from experience that consortium evidence can have a powerful emotional effect on juries, that have the potential to impact both consortium awards and all the other damage categories being requested by the victim. This often motivates asbestos defendants to avoid jury trials where family members testify about their losses, leading to more substantial settlement offers.
Trial Presentation
Presenting consortium evidence requires a thoughtful balance on the part of the mesothelioma attorney, as they need to walk a line between emphasizing the profound impact on family relationships and overwhelming juries with excessively emotional testimony. Effective presentation typically includes:
- Brief but powerful testimony from family members about specific relationship changes
- Video documentation showing family life before and after diagnosis
- Expert testimony explaining the medical basis for relationship impacts
- Focused evidence on the most significant losses rather than exhaustive catalogs of every change
The unique factors and considerations involved in seeking damages for loss of consortium demonstrate why it’s essential to have an experienced attorney who specializes in representing mesothelioma victims representing you.
State Law Variations
Consortium law varies significantly among states, affecting both the availability of claims and potential award amounts. Some states are much more generous with consortium damages than others, and that means that in cases involving multi-state exposure, choosing where to file is a highly strategic decision. Other factors, including statutes of limitations and substantive differences in the law, generally carry more weight.
The Emotional Impact of Consortium Claims
Beyond the important financial relief they provide, consortium claims serve important emotional and psychological needs for families grieving a mesothelioma victim. These claims provide formal recognition from the justice system that family members are also victims of corporate negligence and asbestos exposure. This can be particularly meaningful for spouses, whose suffering and efforts are often overlooked.
The process of documenting consortium losses is an emotional exercise that can be excruciating, but it can also help families understand and articulate the full extent of their losses. The process validates the grief, anger, and loss they might otherwise be unable to express.
The Importance of Working with a Mesothelioma Attorney
Families face mesothelioma together, and consortium claims provide one of the only ways to hold asbestos companies responsible for the harm they’ve caused to spouses and other loved ones. An experienced asbestos attorney can ensure that all aspects of their loss receive proper representation and legal consideration.
References
View All References
